Firefox Extensions, how to make em’ work when they don’t wanna.

So if you’re like me, you run the latest version of beta Firefox, stability be damned. The problem is all those nifty extensions you love suddenly stop working with that little “not compatible with this version of Firefox” BS. Here’s the fix: you know those crazy little .xpi files that Mozilla calls their extensions? well they’re actually just disguised zip files, containing a folder with all the stuff that makes the extension work and a file called “install.rdf” Open this with your favorite text editor, (I use the excellent Notepad++) inside, you will find a LOT of gobblety gook! Look for something like this: “<!– firefox –>” under that you will see this: “<em:maxVersion>3.1b3pre</em:maxVersion>” What you want to be concerned about is the little part in between the ><s  something like “x.xblah” First remove the “blah” letters, leaving only the “x.x” part: 3.1 No since I’m running FF 3.6 Beta 3, I’m just going to say 4.0, so change your “x.x” to a version number in the future. Boom baddy yah, your extension, ready to go.

So here are the steps:

1. Download the offending extension, save it somewhere easy to find, like the desktop.

2. Once downloaded, add a .zip to the end of your .xpi file, then unzip to another folder.

3. In the folder, you will find a file named install.rdf, open it in a text editor.

4. Look for a block titled “<!– firefox –>” inside is a parameter named <em:maxVersion>

5. This is the maximum version of Firefox that this extension will install on.

6. Change this to a version number in the future.

7. Save the file, then re-zip and change the extension to “.xpi”

8.Install the extension, and enjoy (hopefully)

There’s no guarantee that the extension will work, but every time I’ve tried it has, most of the times it’s just that the extension project hasn’t had a chance to update the maxversion since the latest Firefox update.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in IT | 1 Comment

Continuous Lighting; The Pro’s best kept secret: Part 2

What the pros use.

I’m going to cover some continuous lighting equipment that is designed from the ground up for photography and cinematography here, these devices are readily available, but expensive due to their specialized nature.

HMI: Hydrargyrum medium-arc iodide lamps are arguably the best light for photography and film work, they are available in high CRIs and their intensity is practically unmatched. Their extreme intensity as well as their point source allow them to be used as spotlights, illuminating areas from significant distances. Their main problem is their cost, starting with an initial investment in the fixture, ballast, and bulb of around $10K, and with bulb costing upwards of $500 and lasting ~1000 hours, maintenance costs are prohibitive as well. These lights have been the status quo for large productions for years, despite their cost.

Pros: Bright, can be used for fill in direct sun. Intense, point source, useful for spot and long-throw applications. Good CRI, renders colors accurately.

Cons: Expensive, initial investment of ~$10,000 makes them a little out of range of most photographers. Color Temperature Drift, color temperature changes as the lamp wears, ~1000K change over the life of the lamp. New lamps must be “burned in” new lamps start at about 10,000K, settling into their design temperature after about 2 hours of burning. Heavy, even electronic ballast units are still very heavy, and the magnetic previous generation ballasts are extremely heavy.

Halogen: Halogen lighting is better than regular incandescent, typically having a higher color temperature. Small, lightweight and very portable, halogen lights are great for on-location high intensity, or wide flood applications. Halogen’s main downside is the immense amount of heat generated, due to the fact that they are a black body type emission. They typically require a lot of power as well, with many pro lights being at least a kilowatt. At one time the de facto standard for continuous portrait lighting, they are quickly losing ground in the studio to our next subject.

Pros: Lightweight, since they run off mains voltages, they require no heavy or bulky ballasts, making them ideal for on-location shooting. Less expensive, cheaper than HMI both in initial cost and maintenance, bulb life is typically between 2,000 and 10,000 hours. Universal, because they’ve been around a while, there are a multitude of diffusers, umbrellas and other accessories available.

Cons: Heat, HOT HOT HOT, despite being 150-200% more efficient than tungsten incandescent, more than 95% of the energy used is released as heat. Color Temperature, typical color temperature of halogen photographic lamps is 3200K, looking distinctly warm if used with either daylight or strobe. Efficiency, with typical lamps ranging from 500 to 1500 watts, you’ll need a substantial power source to run a set of these lamps.

Fluorescent: Cool, daylight balanced fluorescent is quickly becoming the main continuous lighting product in the pro’s toolkit. Products range from large dimmable arrays of 48″ tubes to simple clusters of high wattage CFLs. With 5500K daylight and strobe balanced lamps available, the ability to mix continuous, sunlight, and strobe is unparalleled. Fluorescent light is naturally diffuse, emitting from the internal surface of the bulb rather than a filament in the center, this is great for most photographic work, but is a shortcoming when you need to throw light any distance. A few of the CFL cluster fixtures are capable of some spot or throw capabilities, but it is limited.

Pros: Diffuse, naturally soft, it takes minimal accessories to make the perfect portrait light. CRI, available with CRIs of over 95, colors render well with the pop of full spectrum. Color Temperature, available with virtually any color temperature, they can be balanced with either daylight/strobe, or tungsten. Efficiency, a 45 Watt lamp puts out as much light as an 150 watt incandescent, meaning fewer heavy cords to haul around the site.

Cons: Diffuse, light is not directionally biased in emission, making it hard to throw any meaningful distance. Size, due to the relatively low intensity of fluorescent, fixtures tend to be pretty bulky, when working with tube based fixtures, minimum length is 48”. Fragile, Bulk also increases due to the protection needed for the lamps made from thin glass.

This gives a pretty good overview of what’s available on the market today, the only source I did not cover is LED, and it is becoming viable. I will probably add it later, but I’m not quite as informed on those as I am on the other types. My next post will deal with how to “re-purpose” some inexpensive non-photographic lighting equipment for creating your own continuous lighting kit.

Andrew Rodgers

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Lighting, Photography | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Continuous Lighting; The Pro’s best kept secret: Part 1

I’m going to try and cover a lot of ground in these posts, I will try to put links to more info in areas where I skim, Wikipedia has some great info! We will start by discussing some of the things that make up suitable light for photography.

What makes good light?

There are several parameters one must look at to determine the quality of a light source, we’re going to spend a little time talking about them here.

Temperature/White Balance

As the temperature decreases, the peak of the ...
Image via Wikipedia

The color temperature of the light, measured in Kelvin Degrees, indicates the spectrum distribution as related to a black-body emission. I will not attempt to cover this fully, but a few common numbers are: Direct Sunlight 5500K, Shade 6500K, Tungsten/Incandescent 3500K, and Strobe/flash 5500K.  Fluorescent lamps can have color temperatures as low as 3000K and as high as 8000K, making it difficult to prepare to shoot under fluorescent lamps you haven’t seen before.

CRI Color Rendering Index is a measurement of how well a given light source matches the spectrum distribution of a black body emission. Light that comes from black body sources: daylight, tungsten, and halogen, has a CRI of 100, or a 100% match to the expected black body spectrum distribution. Metal Halide and Sodium Vapor lamps can have CRIs as low as 45, hardly suitable for a work environment, much less photography. Most modern fluorescents will have a CRI of over 70, making them OK, but not great light sources. Fluorescents are however, available with CRIs as high as 98, making them indistinguishable from natural light. A fluorescent with a CRI of at least 90 is suitable for most all photography, giving you full rich colors that jump with vibrancy.

Efficiency You may think efficiency in photographic lights is an after thought, and it is one of the lower priorities, but the thing to remember is that all of that energy wasted to inefficiency is still emitted as heat. Thus, any increase in efficiency is a decrease in the heat produced. Cooler lights equals more comfortable, patient, and less irritable clients, happy clients equals repeat customers equals more money :) Another case for efficiency is that the less power you use the fewer cables you have to drag around during setup, and the lighter and easier to carry your equipment is. So efficiency is important, just for different reasons than maybe you thought.

So the thing to remember, in choosing your continuous light sources, is the closer the temperature to daylight (5500K) and the higher the CRI, the better, some efficiency thrown in doesn’t hurt. Next post we’ll discuss the products available to pro photographers and their associated pros and cons.

See you then,
Andrew Rodgers

http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol

Hydrargyrum medium-arc iodide lamp

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Lighting, Photography | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Using OSS and Cloud Computing to empower your business

I have built most of my business practices using either OSS (Open Source Software) or SaaS (Software as a Service) most of these tools cost little or nothing, and provide functionality as good or greater than the conventional offerings. I’ve decided to create this list as a resource for other small business owners, to provide them with at least a starting point for their journey into OSS and SaaS.

1. Data Storage
One thing most small businesses need is a place to store their data, last time I checked a license for Microsoft Small Business Server cost over $1000.00, a Ubuntu server disk is a 1 hour download and 20 minute setup to have a Samba File Server set up. Completely FREE. (This same machine can double as your network router as well, faster than 90% of the crap marketed to the SMB sector)

Now that you have your file server setup, you need to keep a backup of your data, Tape Backup is dead, commodity hard drives are so cheap, that buying drives is literally cheaper than purchasing a tape drive and tapes. A hot-swap bay in the front of your machine makes this a painless process, simply swap in the empty drive, and let the server copy the data from your main array.

Now some may not want to deal with the headache of managing their own off-site backups, for them a new cloud-based SaaS called Symform is a great solution. For a small monthly management fee, they’ll take your data, make a lot of copies of it, encrypt it using military grade encryption, and store it on a distributed network of servers. The catch? You have to provide as much local storage as you use on the “cloud,” since hard drives are cheap, this model works very well!

If you really want to know exactly where your data sleeps at night, Amazon’s S3 (Simple Storage Service) Cloud Storage System offers affordable secure storage starting at $0.15 GB per month, there are fee involved with storing and retrieving your data, but for backups, the cost is very small. The great part about this technology is the incredible scalability, you can go from a few Gigabytes to 100’s of Terabytes instantly, and you only pay for what you use.

If you don’t have a server, and just want to back up your laptop or desktop, Dropbox’s simple interface offers a bulletproof way to keep things synced, both between devices, and to their secure backup servers.

2. Communication & E-Mail
I use Google’s SaaS solution for myself and my customers with great success, aptly named Apps for your Domain, it was one of Google’s first big launches in the market that is predominately Microsoft controlled. In the afore-mentioned Microsoft Small Business server, an e-mail solution is included, for 5 users, extra user licenses are available, but you have to pay. Google offers up to 25 users in their free product, Google Apps Standard. Offering the familiar Gmail interface as a web client and still connecting to software clients using standard IMAP and POP3 protocols, it’s perfect for most small businesses, you get the reliability of off-site hosted solution with no to very low-cost.

For those that do like a desktop client, Mozilla’s Thunderbird, with the Lightning plug-in, offers all the functionality of Microsoft Outlook, without the hefty price tag. Also you can use the calendar and contact module to sync to the cloud-hosted Google Apps’ contacts and calendar, allowing you to over-the-air sync with many mobile phones and devices. I’ve been personally using this system for quite a while and don’t miss Outlook at all.

Another great feature of Google Apps for your Domain is an included Jabber/Google Talk server, making team communication a breeze. Useful for everything from teleconferencing to inter office communication, Google Talk is a great resource for the Small Business User.

3. Word Processing / Documents

Google’s Apps for your Domain does include their online cloud based word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation apps. Some may not like the “online-only” model though, for those users, the Sun Microsystems sponsored OSS OpenOffice.org is a great product, compatible with all major file formats, and capable of exporting universally acceptable PDFs, OpenOffice can save a lot of cash. With modules covering graphics, spreadsheets, documents, and databases, OpenOffice.org has the tools you need to run your business.

4. Mind/Project/Knowledge Management

This is an important task for engineering and development teams, an effective engineering library can do a lot to keep from re-inventing the wheel every time you add a member to the team. Searchable, multi media, and easy are all traits that a good Knowledge management portal should have. If you’ve ever used Wikipedia, then you know how a mediawiki works, mediawiki is the software that runs wikipedia, and guess what, it’s OSS! If the software is capable of running the largest crowd sourced repository of knowledge available, it will run your engineering library like a charm. The flexibility of mediawiki is hard to beat, and is also a great tool for collaborative work.

For individual knowledge/mind management, the excellent FreeMind is available, useful for organizing tasks, ideas, creative concepts, even document outlines, FreeMind’s innovative interface is very intuitive and has a natural organizational feel to it.

For big projects for big customers, they really like to see those Gantt charts, the excellent OpenWorkbench will save you having to purchase the leviathan Microsoft Project. Built with compatibility and power in mind OpenWorkbench provides all the tools you need to organize the largest of projects, and allows you to meet documentation requirements for development cycles.

There may be more to follow, but this will get you started!

Andrew Rodgers

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in IT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments